Experts

Allan C. Stam

Fast Facts

  • Former dean, Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy
  • Former director, International Policy Center at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy
  • Expertise on war outcomes, war durations, mediation, alliance politics

Areas Of Expertise

  • Foreign Affairs
  • American Defense and Security
  • War and Terrorism
  • Governance
  • Leadership

Allan C. Stam is a University Professor, professor of public policy and politics, and former dean of the Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy at the University of Virginia. Previously, he was director of the International Policy Center at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy and professor of political science and senior research scientist at the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research. Prior to moving to Michigan in 2007, he was the Daniel Webster Professor at Dartmouth College (2000-2007) and was assistant professor at Yale University (1996-2000). His research focuses on the dynamics of armed conflict between and within states. Before completing his undergraduate degree at Cornell University in 1988, where he earned a varsity letter in heavyweight crew, he served as a communications specialist on an ‘A’ detachment in the U.S. Army Special Forces and later as an armor officer in the U.S. Army Reserves. He holds an MA and PhD in political science from the University of Michigan.

Stam’s work on war outcomes, war durations, mediation, and alliance politics appears in numerous political science journals including the American Political Science ReviewInternational Security, and the British Journal of Political Science. He has received several grants supporting his work, including five from the National Science Foundation. His books include Win, Lose, or Draw (University of Michigan Press, 1996), Democracies at War (Princeton University Press, 2002), The Behavioral Origins of War (University of Michigan Press, 2004), and Why Leaders Fight (Cambridge University Press, 2015). He is a lifetime member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2007 he was a residential fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University. He is the recipient of the 2004 Karl Deutsch Award, given annually by the International Studies Association to the scholar under the age of 40 who has made the greatest contribution to the study of international politics. He has worked on several consulting projects for the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Navy’s Joint Warfare Analysis Center.

Allan C. Stam News Feed

The current war in Ukraine looks as intractable as it is horrifying. It is hard to see possible exit ramps for Vladimir Putin or politically viable concessions for Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Many military analysts envision the war lasting several months, if not years into the future. That grim forecast is easy to anticipate.
Allan C. Stam Miller Center Russia-Ukraine blog
If the Russians can subdue Ukraine, where might an expansion-focused Russian leadership turn next? If restoring in part or whole the borders of the 19th century Russian empire is a goal of President Putin, then the Baltic States -- Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia -- may be a target for aggression. The risks there for the United States are very high. First, these states are members of NATO, which means the U.S. is legally committed to their defense. Our willingness to honor that commitment affects the credibility of our defense commitments everywhere else in the world.
Allan C. Stam Miller Center Russia-Ukraine blog
Among the underappreciated causes of the Ukraine War are European and American environmental politics. Green energy policies of the past two decades have significantly increased the military security risks the international system faces. As we see today in Ukraine, energy inter-dependence of European states with Russia greatly limits the Europeans’ and Americans’ ability to counter military aggression. The greatest and gravest error seems to be the elimination of nuclear energy as a central source of electric power generation in Germany.
Allan C. Stam Miller Center Russia-Ukraine blog
Once countries, soldiers, and citizens begin shooting one another, many so-called "known unknowns" become resolved in unexpected ways. In the Ukraine War, two of the most important initial uncertainties were the resilience of the Ukrainian people and the leadership abilities of President Zelensky. Many in Europe and the United States resolved this uncertainty by assuming the Ukrainians would quickly capitulate, as they had in 2014 when Russia invaded and annexed the Crimean Peninsula.
Allan C. Stam Miller Center Russia-Ukraine blog
It's hard to view Biden as a successful leader, writes Miller Center Senior Fellow Allan Stam.
Allan Stam Miller Center
Since 1776, the United States has been at war 93 percent of the time—227 out of 244 years, according to Global Research. Why is that? And what does it mean for the future of our nation, at home and abroad? This half-day public conference will focus on the roots, management, and direction of so-called “endless wars.” During the five sessions, speakers will consider the political, legal, military, cultural, and governance implications of remaining engaged in these indefinite conflicts, and the future prospects of fighting a “forever war."
Allan Stam Miller Center Presents